I voted for Rocky Anderson for President and Luis Rodriguez for Vice-President, of the United States of America. Although the Anderson-Rodriguez ticket had little chance of succeeding as far as actually winning is concerned, it was a campaign based on earnest principles of human and civil rights, environmental protection, non-imperialism and respect for the Constitution. I respect that, so I voted out of pure principle -- nothing else.
Barack Obama, despite showing courage as a politician, is a neo-liberal adventurer and a willing pawn for the corporate behemoth. Despite the incredulous Nobel Peace Prize he was awarded, he has greatly escalated the number of weaponized drones being sent into various countries, and despite the stated aim of going after terrorists, these drones have also killed innocent civilians by the hundreds, if not thousands, in the Obama and Bush II years. This kind of inevitable indiscrimination is not only bad policy, but immoral as well. Obama and his Attorney General, Eric Holder, have also passed on prosecuting torturers and Wall Street hooligans, and Obama has thrown the Bill of Rights under the bus with the proviso to the National Defense Authorization Act that allows for unconstitional arrests of American citizens or others without any due process required at all. It's amazing that this "law" passed with so little uproar by Americans.
As for Mitt Romney, his statement behind closed doors about 47% of the population said all you really needed to know about him. If he would have been elected, he would have been a very divisive leader in a nation that needs to come together more than ever.
I could have voted for one of several other third party or independent candidates besides Rocky Anderson, but the Anderson-Rodriguez ticket impressed me as being very genuine and honest, not that most or all of the other third party or independent candidates weren't. Sorry, you didn't win, Rocky, you should have.
- by Mark Greene
[revised on 11/18/12]
A compendium of political news about Washington state by the Revived Citizens Party.
Nov 17, 2012
Nov 15, 2012
"Report" Sidetracked by Other Work
Northern Pacific Report may be less comprehensive about Newcastle government affairs than I would like it to be as a result of new work obligations that I have taken on, particularly during hours when it is least advantageous for this journalistic endeavor. This is the only reason why I missed yesterday's Park Commission meeting and why I may miss further commission and council meetings, in general, in the near future. As a result, N.P.R. may come to have less news and more opinion in it, at least until January of 2013, but at this date I am not certain how this blog will develop as a result of the new and changing circumstances. I will keep readers informed, however. None of this changes anything about my expected plans to run for the Newcastle City Council or other offices. I plan to make an announcement on this blog about my council plans on December 10th.
- by Mark Greene, Editor of Northern Pacific Report
[revised on 11/17/12]
- by Mark Greene, Editor of Northern Pacific Report
[revised on 11/17/12]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Just when I was going to take a little break from writing (until Election Day), the Newcastle News dropped in with two old friends. ...
-
Although, Northern Pacific Report will continue to provide coverage of all or nearly all Newcastle Council Meetings in the future, we will ...
-
N.P.R. mistakenly put an anti-environmental site in one of the links to the right side a few days ago, wrongly thinking that it was a pro-e...