It's hard to believe that someone who was just elected to the Newcastle City Council last year, reportedly voted in favor of "discussion" about making Newcastle a part of Bellevue, but that's what the Newcastle News reported that Gordon Bissett did. It would be interesting to know if Bisset would have been elected in '11 if he had made "discussion" of annexation a part of his election platform then. I doubt it. Councilman Bill Erxleben, who started this whole kerfuffle about the annexation of Newcastle at the September 4th council meeting (which I unfortunately missed), also voted for "discussion" about annexation, of course. The majority, the other five councilmembers, to their credit, voted against it, although some of them, according to the News report, seemed a little wobbly about keeping Newcastle as it own city. At least, Erxleben made sure that this issue will be front and center in next year's council elections for 3 council seats in which Erxleben, himself, is up for re-election in one of them. I'm not sure what historical analogy this would be comparable to or somewhat comparable to if there were any real moves by the council on this issue; perhaps, Hawaii becoming a territory of the United States in the late 19th century, but I don't believe there was a plebiscite by the natives of Hawaii for approval of annexation as would probably occur in this case if this issue was escalated, although I'm not sure at this time whether the Washington Constitution demands plebiscites for annexation. I will answer that question in a future essay on Northern Pacific Report, but I also welcome comments on this blog about pertinent information or your opinions about local and national matters.
I am against annexation to any city, and my opposition to annexation is not the least bit uncertain. As far as I'm concerned, Newcastle should always remain Newcastle, period. I read Erxleben's explanatory letter about annexation in the News (in the same October 4th - 5th issue that the report about it came out), however, believe it or not, everything about life is not about money, and as far as I'm concerned, money doesn't take precedence over certain principles. Moreover, just like practically any city in the nation these days, Newcastle has financial problems, and we will manage to get through them one way or the other. Ever since I ran for the council in '07, I have proposed expanding businesses in Newcastle by proposing that the city become a center of clean, renewable and green energy production, which would in turn expand the retail market and the overall tax base, thereby greatly enhancing Newcastle's revenue outlook. Even if this plan doesn't happen, there are other ways to keep the city financially afloat without surrendering to the money god. Bellevue is a great city, and the residents there have been of critical importance in making sure that my petitions succeed, but that doesn't mean that Newcastle should be annexed to them. I will never support annexation under any circumstances whatsoever.
- by Mark Greene
[revised on 10/14/12]
Mark Greene's Book on Elections: Elections: Reform &
Administration
Party of
Commons
Mark Greene for
Secretary of State (write-in candidacy)
Commons on Twitter
"Commoner" Blog
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
Oct 14, 2012
Oct 8, 2012
Lowering Salaries: The Council Was Right
The Newcastle City Council did the right thing in this era of the Great Recession (or depression) and tight local budgets by lowering their "own" salaries, even though it may be a little on the cynical side if none or only some of the ones who voted for the decrease run for re-election, because then the decrease may not effect them at all.
Sherril Huff, the sitting Director of Elections, is on a pace to collect a million dollars in salary, soon (if she hasn't already exceeded that), for a few year's work. Huff and the overpaid King County Council could learn something from the Newcastle City Council, like exploring the word sacrifice, even if "sacrifice" has cynical quotation marks around it. At least it's a start. When I ran for Director of Elections last year, I proposed that the elected director's salary be reduced by 50%, but of course the reliably corrupt Mainstream Media did not report that or anything else about the Director's election of '11. As a man of the people, if I had been elected, I was prepared to make this sacrifice, because I realize that public officials should be equal amongst the people in all matters, generally speaking, including in regards to general compensation for work done. Luxurious Congressional salaries in D.C. (around 180K annually) should also be reduced significantly.
- by Mark Greene
[revised on 10/12/12]
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
Sherril Huff, the sitting Director of Elections, is on a pace to collect a million dollars in salary, soon (if she hasn't already exceeded that), for a few year's work. Huff and the overpaid King County Council could learn something from the Newcastle City Council, like exploring the word sacrifice, even if "sacrifice" has cynical quotation marks around it. At least it's a start. When I ran for Director of Elections last year, I proposed that the elected director's salary be reduced by 50%, but of course the reliably corrupt Mainstream Media did not report that or anything else about the Director's election of '11. As a man of the people, if I had been elected, I was prepared to make this sacrifice, because I realize that public officials should be equal amongst the people in all matters, generally speaking, including in regards to general compensation for work done. Luxurious Congressional salaries in D.C. (around 180K annually) should also be reduced significantly.
- by Mark Greene
[revised on 10/12/12]
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
Oct 4, 2012
Erxleben Versus Bisset
City of Newcastle, WA -- Council Meeting of
10/2/12
By a vote of 6 - 1, with Bill Erxleben dissenting, the Newcastle City Council voted to hire a police detective for the city, with some councilmembers noting Newcastle's burglary problem as a reason. Erxleben, the council's foremost budget hawk (at least in terms of speechmaking), said he opposed the motion by Gordon Bisset for a detective, because it was premature prior to the preliminary 2013 budget, not on its merits. In support of the motion, John Dulcich said, basically, that security concerns were too important and that the budget could be worked out or adapted to provide for a detective.
Later on in the meeting, the council was in a tizzy for 15 minutes-or-so over a motion by Erxleben to essentially upgrade proposals regarding the 116th Street pedestrian improvements in the overall economic plans of the city. The motion, which failed on a 4 - 3 vote, caused verbal brickbats between Erxleben and Bisset, who accused Erxleben of budgetary inconsistency as general disarray reigned throughout this segment of the council meeting until the city manager, Rob Wyman, and Mayor Rich Crispo brought about order by chiding members and closing out the motion proceedings. Erxleben supported Bisset's election to the council in 2011, and wrote a letter on his behalf in the Newcastle News prior to the general election, essentially, requesting citizens of Newcastle to vote for Bisset. Bisset had been on the council several years ago before taking office, again, in January of '12. There seemed to be general agreement that Erxleben's motion was not that crucial in deciding how all of this would play out; apparently, because of the preliminary nature of the budget and more decisive votes to come.
Votes regarding Councilmember Erxleben's Motion about 116th St.:
Yes (Approving Motion): Erxleben, Crispo and Dulcich.
No (Disapproving Motion): Buri, Simpson, Bisset and Jensen.
[revised on 10/4/12]
Mark Greene's Book on Elections: Elections: Reform & Administration
Party of Commons
Mark Greene for Secretary of State (write-in candidacy)
Commons on Twitter
"Commoner" Blog
King County Bulletin No. 2 can be found in the comments.
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
By a vote of 6 - 1, with Bill Erxleben dissenting, the Newcastle City Council voted to hire a police detective for the city, with some councilmembers noting Newcastle's burglary problem as a reason. Erxleben, the council's foremost budget hawk (at least in terms of speechmaking), said he opposed the motion by Gordon Bisset for a detective, because it was premature prior to the preliminary 2013 budget, not on its merits. In support of the motion, John Dulcich said, basically, that security concerns were too important and that the budget could be worked out or adapted to provide for a detective.
Later on in the meeting, the council was in a tizzy for 15 minutes-or-so over a motion by Erxleben to essentially upgrade proposals regarding the 116th Street pedestrian improvements in the overall economic plans of the city. The motion, which failed on a 4 - 3 vote, caused verbal brickbats between Erxleben and Bisset, who accused Erxleben of budgetary inconsistency as general disarray reigned throughout this segment of the council meeting until the city manager, Rob Wyman, and Mayor Rich Crispo brought about order by chiding members and closing out the motion proceedings. Erxleben supported Bisset's election to the council in 2011, and wrote a letter on his behalf in the Newcastle News prior to the general election, essentially, requesting citizens of Newcastle to vote for Bisset. Bisset had been on the council several years ago before taking office, again, in January of '12. There seemed to be general agreement that Erxleben's motion was not that crucial in deciding how all of this would play out; apparently, because of the preliminary nature of the budget and more decisive votes to come.
Votes regarding Councilmember Erxleben's Motion about 116th St.:
Yes (Approving Motion): Erxleben, Crispo and Dulcich.
No (Disapproving Motion): Buri, Simpson, Bisset and Jensen.
[revised on 10/4/12]
Mark Greene's Book on Elections: Elections: Reform & Administration
Party of Commons
Mark Greene for Secretary of State (write-in candidacy)
Commons on Twitter
"Commoner" Blog
King County Bulletin No. 2 can be found in the comments.
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
Sep 28, 2012
Paraphrasing Lee: "I Make the Recommendations, the Council Gives Guidance."
City of Newcastle, WA -- Planning Commission Meeting of
9/27/12
Newcastle Associate Planner, David Lee, gave a studious 20-minute-or-so presentation about the Comprehensive Plan, which was named, officially, the City of Newcastle Comprehensive Plan Update, and seeks, in accordance with state law, to set the city's policies regarding physical and economic development, thereby providing a focus point and educational guide for the Council, town residents and other stakeholders. Comprehensive plans, made every eight years by various towns and municipalities in Washington, are coordinated with the Growth Management Act, a state law. At one point, a commissioner asked Lee about the manner of guidance, if any, that the Commission would get from the Council about how to proceed. Lee responded, basically, that he makes recommendations to the Council, but it's up to the Council to communicate with the Commission about guidance. A clear delineation of his responsibilities and the council's. Further updates on Northern Pacific Report will be given later on about the specifics of the Comprehensive Plan as the initial proceedings set the groundwork for how it should develop.
Commissioners in attendance: Rob Lemmon (Chairman), John Drescher (Vice-Chairman), Tom Magers, Jon Simpson, Elizabeth Thompson, Allen Dauterman, and Karin Blakley.
[revised on 9/29/12]
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
Newcastle Associate Planner, David Lee, gave a studious 20-minute-or-so presentation about the Comprehensive Plan, which was named, officially, the City of Newcastle Comprehensive Plan Update, and seeks, in accordance with state law, to set the city's policies regarding physical and economic development, thereby providing a focus point and educational guide for the Council, town residents and other stakeholders. Comprehensive plans, made every eight years by various towns and municipalities in Washington, are coordinated with the Growth Management Act, a state law. At one point, a commissioner asked Lee about the manner of guidance, if any, that the Commission would get from the Council about how to proceed. Lee responded, basically, that he makes recommendations to the Council, but it's up to the Council to communicate with the Commission about guidance. A clear delineation of his responsibilities and the council's. Further updates on Northern Pacific Report will be given later on about the specifics of the Comprehensive Plan as the initial proceedings set the groundwork for how it should develop.
Commissioners in attendance: Rob Lemmon (Chairman), John Drescher (Vice-Chairman), Tom Magers, Jon Simpson, Elizabeth Thompson, Allen Dauterman, and Karin Blakley.
[revised on 9/29/12]
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
Sep 20, 2012
Donations Sought For This Blog
Northern Pacific Report hopes to report on council meetings, and possibly some interesting court hearings and trials, around the Puget Sound Area on a regular basis. This blog will focus on Newcastle, particularly, but may also go to places like Mercer Island, Bellevue, Seattle and Federal Way on an occasional basis. To help me with this work, particularly for time spent and travel expenses, I'm asking for any kind of donations to extend this journalistic work. I expect to report on Newcastle on a regular basis, including some commission meetings as well as almost all council meetings. In order to get the word out about Northern Pacific Report, I'll be passing out fliers and posting on social media sites, but readers' word-of-mouth or social media communications would also be appreciated. Thanks!
Previous post: "Town Council Decreases Own Salaries"
- Mark Greene, chairman of the Party of Commons
[revised on 9/21/12]
Name and Address for donations: (prefer checks or money orders)
(Mark Greene/Party of Commons), P.O. Box 612, Bellevue, WA 98009
Previous post: "Town Council Decreases Own Salaries"
- Mark Greene, chairman of the Party of Commons
[revised on 9/21/12]
Name and Address for donations: (prefer checks or money orders)
(Mark Greene/Party of Commons), P.O. Box 612, Bellevue, WA 98009
Sep 19, 2012
Town Council Decreases Own Salaries
City of Newcastle, WA -- Council Meeting of 9/18/12
In a token but decisive effort to shore up this small city's budget, the Newcastle City Council voted 4 to 3 to decrease regular council member salaries to $500 per month, and decrease the mayor's salary to $600 per month. A $200-or-so decrease. This action was taken on Tues., Sept. 18th, despite the improved, if not overly rosy, budget forecast by Finance Director, Chris Olson. Olson had said earlier in the meeting that the city's revenues were expected to increase more than previously expected because of increases in sources such as retail sales taxes and development revenue, and that a budget surplus would ensue. Councilmember Bill Erxleben did not seem particularly impressed with the forecast as he noted that needed repairs to streets and roads in Newcastle would conceivably take up a large part of future budgets, and implied that nobody should be jumping for joy over Newcastle's financial future. Councilmember John Dulcich and Mayor Rich Crispo, in his dual role as mayor and councilmember, took a more conciliatory tone regarding the budget, as the mayor, in particular, downplayed Erxleben's concern that streets and roads would be as troublesome and burdensome for the city as Erxleben portended. Erxleben said that it was the city's responsibility to have a first-rate infrastructure system, putting particular emphasis on streets and roads. Councilmember Carol Simpson said that the city must not neglect security concerns besides infrastructure concerns, implying that the size of the city's police force was not keeping pace with Newcastle's population growth.
Regarding the salary decrease ordinance, Councilmember Simpson and Deputy Mayor Lisa Jensen both were concerned about who would be the Newcastle councilmembers of the future if the salaries were so low that it would tend to dissuade some members of the public from running for office; Jensen, in particular, stressed the importance of having a diverse council. Councilmember Dulcich suggested that any council member who voted for the ordinance should return some or all of their salary to the city, now, as any such solicitous feeling could be immediately effected. He said the whole exercise about salaries was a "feel-good" proposition, and that it couldn't take effect anyway, by law, until new council terms took effect. Erxleben, at first, said that he would vote against the ordinance because it didn't decrease salaries low enough for his taste, but later changed his mind, apparently because his vote looked decisive, which it indeed was.
The council, by a vote of 6 - 1, Gordon Bisset dissenting, also approved a "temporary" public works project regarding storm water management to be directed by Public Works Director, Mark Rigos, at a cost of about fifty thousand dollars.
Votes regarding decreasing salaries were as follows:
Yes: Crispo, Bisset, Erxleben and Buri
No: Simpson, Dulcich and Jensen
[revised on 9/19/12]
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
In a token but decisive effort to shore up this small city's budget, the Newcastle City Council voted 4 to 3 to decrease regular council member salaries to $500 per month, and decrease the mayor's salary to $600 per month. A $200-or-so decrease. This action was taken on Tues., Sept. 18th, despite the improved, if not overly rosy, budget forecast by Finance Director, Chris Olson. Olson had said earlier in the meeting that the city's revenues were expected to increase more than previously expected because of increases in sources such as retail sales taxes and development revenue, and that a budget surplus would ensue. Councilmember Bill Erxleben did not seem particularly impressed with the forecast as he noted that needed repairs to streets and roads in Newcastle would conceivably take up a large part of future budgets, and implied that nobody should be jumping for joy over Newcastle's financial future. Councilmember John Dulcich and Mayor Rich Crispo, in his dual role as mayor and councilmember, took a more conciliatory tone regarding the budget, as the mayor, in particular, downplayed Erxleben's concern that streets and roads would be as troublesome and burdensome for the city as Erxleben portended. Erxleben said that it was the city's responsibility to have a first-rate infrastructure system, putting particular emphasis on streets and roads. Councilmember Carol Simpson said that the city must not neglect security concerns besides infrastructure concerns, implying that the size of the city's police force was not keeping pace with Newcastle's population growth.
Regarding the salary decrease ordinance, Councilmember Simpson and Deputy Mayor Lisa Jensen both were concerned about who would be the Newcastle councilmembers of the future if the salaries were so low that it would tend to dissuade some members of the public from running for office; Jensen, in particular, stressed the importance of having a diverse council. Councilmember Dulcich suggested that any council member who voted for the ordinance should return some or all of their salary to the city, now, as any such solicitous feeling could be immediately effected. He said the whole exercise about salaries was a "feel-good" proposition, and that it couldn't take effect anyway, by law, until new council terms took effect. Erxleben, at first, said that he would vote against the ordinance because it didn't decrease salaries low enough for his taste, but later changed his mind, apparently because his vote looked decisive, which it indeed was.
The council, by a vote of 6 - 1, Gordon Bisset dissenting, also approved a "temporary" public works project regarding storm water management to be directed by Public Works Director, Mark Rigos, at a cost of about fifty thousand dollars.
Votes regarding decreasing salaries were as follows:
Yes: Crispo, Bisset, Erxleben and Buri
No: Simpson, Dulcich and Jensen
[revised on 9/19/12]
Copyright 2009 - 2012, Party of Commons TM
Jul 9, 2011
King County Bulletin
Not that many voters are aware of it, due to the negligence of a partisan, ideologically controlled news media, but there is an election for King County Director of Elections in November, 2011. The news blockade about the position that runs the elections department is just another piece of the puzzle about a media that is more concerned about controlling events than merely reporting the story. Objective journalism in the United States has become the purview of a handful of newspapers, blogs, radio stations and others, but being a part of the establishment-run apparatus that works primarily for the benefit of big business is the main status of the overwhelming number of so-called journalistic outfits, and that includes a good number of the quasi-alternative papers and slick news oriented internet sites & blogs. It's no accident that media organizations that downplay certain political campaigns also usually endorse the opponents of these campaigns. This is the FOX-ification of the broader sphere of journalism in the nation, today, and although this is really nothing new (objectivity and fair practices in journalism were just as rare 100 and 200 years ago as they are today), there still needs to be a reminder to the public every now and then that the big media outfits have deep biases and business-driven motives to distort, ignore or disproportionately promote stories.
[revised on 7/13/11]
Updates on "King County Bulletin" may be following in the coming stays.
Copyright 2009 - 2011, Party of Commons TM
[revised on 7/13/11]
Updates on "King County Bulletin" may be following in the coming stays.
Copyright 2009 - 2011, Party of Commons TM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)